Stop the Power Grab: An Open Letter on the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty

/ brianpeckford

BY RHODA WILSON ON MARCH 11, 2022 •

L

The World Council for Health (“WCH”), a coalition of scientists, doctors, lawyers, and civil society advocacy organisations, opposes the World Health Organisation (“WHO”)’s moves to implement a power grab in the form of a global pandemic agreement, while the world’s attention is diverted by the latest crisis.

The proposed WHO agreement is unnecessary, and is a threat to sovereignty and inalienable rights. It increases the WHO’s suffocating power to declare unjustified pandemics, impose dehumanising lockdowns, and enforce expensive, unsafe, and ineffective treatments against the will of the people.

The WHO cannot be allowed to control the world’s health agenda, nor enforce bio-surveillance. While it receives funding from public sources belonging to the people, it is caught in a perpetual conflict of interest because it also receives substantial funding from private interests that use their contributions to influence and profit from WHO decisions and mandates.

WCH partners, from Australia to Zimbabwe, stand against this costly abuse of power and assert the sovereign right of people to make their own decisions, over and above what their representatives may want. We urge everyone to approach credible government representatives, political parties, trade unions, civil society groups, professionals, public figures, and independent media.

Read WCH’s call to action: First Open Letter on the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty, World Council for Health, 8 March 2022

During an interview with Dana Loesch, co-founder of the WCH, Dr. Tess Lawrie, discussed the corruption of journals such as JAMA – who launched a campaign against ivermectin, in spite of the randomised trials and studies proving how effective ivermectin actually is.

She also briefly explained how health bodies around the world have been suppressing ivermectin in order to promote the experimental and dangerous Covid injections and her letter to Dr Andrew Hill. Hill was tasked to report to the WHO on the dozens of studies from around the world suggesting that ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for Covid. However, Hill, who was seeking a global recommendation on ivermectin, inexplicably recommended against it

At the end of the interview, Dr. Lawrie explained that the WHO is in the process of granting themselves more power – under the guise of a “Treaty” – in preparation for the next “pandemic” they declare.

The video below has been embedded to begin at the section relating to the WHO Treaty.

Dana Loesch

W.H.O. POWER GRAB: Dr. Tess Lawrie On The WHO’s ‘Pandemic Treaty’

Try watching this video on http://www.youtube.com</a>, or enable JavaScript if it is disabled in your browser.</div></div>

Dana Loesch: WHO Power Grab, Dr. Tess Lawrie on The WHO’s ‘Pandemic Treaty’, 10 March 2022 (13 mins)

At the time of writing this episode was only available on YouTube, however should it be removed from YouTube you may be able to find it on The Dana Show’s Rumble channel HERE.

Source: Daily Expose

12 thoughts on “Stop the Power Grab: An Open Letter on the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty”

  2. We each need to learn about and become more articulate about the observable facts based principle of individual rights. When these are suspended for any “reezon” (purposely misspelled to distinguish from the meritorious method), you are having your humanity taken from you and it is thus deeply immoral!

    The principle of Individual Rights is equivalent to the principles of thermodynamics. It’s a philosophical (=scientific) discovery. Its an intellectual accomplishment acquired by thought and observation of reality of human nature, ultimately incorporated into our culture and coded into law by the genius of Enlightenment thinkers which included the American founding fathers.

    As Christian Deists, they were Christians who prioritized facts based reasoning over mystical revelation, and thus accomplished MORAL CERTAINTY (conviction) against the authoritarian super-power of their time (defied the biblical divine right of kings). The circumstances of their time prevented them from exploring the philosophical origins of individualism due to the risk of being cancelled or worse by the religious authoritarians of their time (they were already pushing the limit).

    Being moral means acting to pursue and realize those values required for your own all encompassing health and happiness in your own life (an egoistic selfish moral code first drafted with flaws by Aristotle). Yielding and/or sacrificing your values for the sake of all others for nothing or less in return (e.g. acquiescing to mask mandates for your child) is self destructing, nihilistic, and thus deeply immoral!

    Rights are NOT granted by govt nor by God, but are prerequisite principles that protect our ability to exist as humans in a social context. Humans are rational animals who must have their ability to think and choose protected in order to reason (our only means to knowledge) and thus to preserve our humanity (our ability to choose and to thus make use of our own mind). It is only individuals that can choose to reason, and it is only individuals who experience happiness. Not the collective. A society has as constituents, individuals.

    Like

    Reply

  3. No matter how this ends, Canada needs to define the word “pandemic”. Less than 1% of Canadians testing positive to SARS-CoV-2 over a period of 12 months is not a pandemic in my view.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  4. Reblogged this on The Most Revolutionary Act and commented:
    WCH partners, from Australia to Zimbabwe, stand against this costly abuse of power and assert the sovereign right of people to make their own decisions, over and above what their representatives may want. We urge everyone to approach credible government representatives, political parties, trade unions, civil society groups, professionals, public figures, and independent media.

    Like

    Reply

  5. Pingback: Stop the Power Grab: An Open Letter on the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty — peckford42 – Independent Citizens

Leave a comment