Conclusions Of The book ‘Turtles All The Way Down’—Part 1 —“If Vaccines Were Safe

“Let us consider a what-if scenario in total opposition to the picture that emerges from the ten chapters outlined in the previous section.

 What if the health establishment were actually right about vaccine safety? 

What if common vaccine side effects were indeed mild and transient and severe vaccine injury as rare as “one in a million”? If so, how would that fit with other aspects of vaccine safety policy? In other words, is the way the health establishment conducts vaccine-safety activities consistent with its categorical assertion that vaccines are very safe? 

If vaccines did not cause serious adverse events, as we are repeatedly told, then there would be no rational reason to give control groups in pre-licensure clinical trials another vaccine, as is the current norm. 

Administering a placebo to the control group in a clinical trial is superior in every relevant aspect: Not only is it cheaper and simpler than using another vaccine, it also provides reliable background rates for both efficacy and safety. 

Furthermore, there would also be no rationale for giving a control group the vaccine-sans-antigen in a vaccine trial. 

Why needlessly risk infants by using a compound that has zero potential benefit and an unknown safety profile, when a safe alternative (placebo) is readily available?

 Why breach basic tenets of medical science ethics for no reason? If the vaccine on trial was expected to have only mild side effects, then what possible reason could there be for employing such a procedure? 

If vaccines were indeed safe, it wouldn’t make sense to waste valuable resources on building and maintaining a computerized system for reporting adverse events of vaccines with inherent defects, well-known to all concerned, that cancel out most of its theoretical benefits. In a world where vaccines were safe, authorities would establish an active system with mandatory reporting by medical personnel, similar to infectious disease reporting systems that have existed in Western countries for decades.

 Such a system would provide reliable estimates of the actual (presumably low) rates of vaccine side effects. This, in turn, would confirm the excellent safety profile obtained in clinical trials, and would further bolster public confidence in the vaccine program. 

If vaccines were safe, vaccine-safety research would be conducted unreservedly, including physiological studies exploring potential links between vaccines and subsequent adverse health events.

 Thus, those rare cases of suspected vaccine injury would receive comprehensive and in-depth medical investigations.

 The specific circumstances of each case would be documented and appropriate laboratory tests conducted. In addition, subsequent biomedical studies would be performed to examine the possible causal association between the vaccine and the ensuing health condition. 

These studies would lay the scientific foundation required for developing diagnostic tools for prescreening those at risk of vaccine injury, as well as effective treatments for the injured, and for the overall improvement of vaccine safety. 

Assuming that vaccines were safe, epidemiological safety studies would not be publicly presented as “conclusive proof”, but as they really are–methodologically limited and potentially biased instruments that can neither confirm nor refute a causal link between vaccination and potential side effects.

 The scientific community would not shy away from discussing the merits (or lack thereof) of these studies, and bad ones would be criticized appropriately. 

If vaccines were indeed safe, health authorities would be happy to meet parents’ growing demand for comprehensive and frequent epidemiological studies examining the overall benefit of the vaccine program and its impact on the incidence of various chronic health conditions. 

Vaccinated vs. unvaccinated studies would surely top the establishment’s priority list, as the results of these studies would likely confirm the safety of vaccines and pacify the concerned parents. 

In addition, research would be conducted to scientifically validate vaccination guidelines before they were actually implemented. Needless to say, all of these studies would be funded and directed by neutral public agencies and would be conducted by objective scientists with no conflicts of interest. This concludes our little “what if” game.

 Now, let’s get back to reality. In the real world, as documented throughout this book, vaccine science is run very differently from the imaginary scenario described above: 

The clinical trials are “cooked”; 

adverse event reporting systems are rudimentary by design; biomedical research into vaccine injury is virtually nonexistent;

 health authorities sponsor biased epidemiological studies, conducted by researchers with huge conflicts of interest; 

studies evaluating the true benefit of the vaccination program are never done and neither are studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated populations; 

and key vaccination guidelines are not based on sound science. 

Each item on this list, as well as the totality of the list, testifies to the inconceivable chasm between institutional claims of safety and the reality of vaccine science. 

While the establishment repeatedly declares that the safety of vaccines has been impeccably tested and proved excellent, its actions convey a deliberate intention to conceal the true magnitude and severity of their harms.

 While they proclaim that the vaccination program is the best and safest possible, the authorities are well aware that its real net benefit has never been scientifically studied. 

While they state that vaccination guidelines are always based on rock-solid science, in reality some were never tested and others are based on shaky scientific foundations.

 While the establishment’s representatives solemnly declare they are doing everything in their power to ensure the safety of vaccines, in practice they are doing anything but.

 In fact, for decades they have deliberately refrained from doing precisely those studies that could clarify vaccines’ association with rising rates of chronic illness. 

Institutionalized Fraud 

For many years, parents and medical professionals have been harshly criticizing health authorities’ deliberate misconduct with respect to vaccination. 

Most of the points raised above are frequently discussed all over the internet, but due to cyberspace limitations it can be hard to absorb their full meaning and implications. 

Nuggets of information are scattered across dozens of different websites, and tremendous effort is required of an individual attempting to form a coherent view out of the chaos.

 Now, however, this body of work is systematically presented and documented in one place, backed up by solid scientific evidence, and it is no longer possible to avoid acknowledging the dire truth. 

This book presented a broad and comprehensive analysis of vaccine safety.

 We scrutinized the field from various angles, and from each of those a similar view emerged: 

Adequate scientific evidence for the safety of vaccines is severely lacking, and health agencies and pharmaceutical companies are deliberately concealing their true harms from the public. 

This grim reality cannot be attributed to some local failure, a one-time random deviation from proper procedure, or a “standard” bureaucratic failure of some government entity.

 The individual parts seem to mesh so perfectly that it is very difficult to view them as coincidental and unrelated mishaps.

 Thus, one must inevitably conclude that all parties involved are engaged in deliberate and systematic efforts to hide the painful, astonishing, and earth-shattering truth regarding the “safety” of vaccines from the public.

 It is imperative to clarify at this point: We are not claiming that vaccines are a complete and utter scam. Diseases are real, and some vaccines protect against contracting disease. The historic record shows that vaccination played a significant role in reducing the incidence of some infectious diseases. 

That said, however, there is no question that the health establishment engages in deceptive propaganda designed to exaggerate and artificially inflate the benefits of vaccines. 

Thus, it is responsible for 

maintaining the fiction that vaccines played a primary role in neutralizing the threat of infectious disease, 

for promoting the falsely heroic story of the polio vaccine,

 and for manipulatively misusing the concept of herd immunity to justify mandating vaccination. 

But wrong as it is to push false narratives that glorify vaccines’ benefits, the concerted and institutionalized effort to conceal their harms is a much graver offense. 

This deliberate policy, employed by the health establishment for decades and supported by other related parties, is the deceptive foundation on which the entire house of cards is built. 

At this point, you may be wondering whether doctors are aware of the facts presented in this book. Could they possibly know about the enormous fraud that has harmed so many millions of our children? And if so, what is their reaction to all of this? 

The answer is that, apart from a tiny minority, doctors are completely unaware of the vaccine fraud. 

Most of them have no clue how vaccines are tested in their pre-licensure clinical trials. The vast majority would probably be surprised to hear that the vaccine program they believe to be immaculate has never been tested for safety, or that studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated subpopulations have never been done. 

Doctors do not study vaccines in medical school much beyond memorizing the current schedule and, other than the few who specialize in vaccinology, have no incentive or time to dig deeper into a field that is not their specialty.

 Even pediatricians and family doctors don’t feel a need for further vaccine knowledge, as the vaccine schedule is set by the health authorities and vaccine injuries, they are taught and conveniently believe, are one in a million. 

Most of the higher-ups, however, who run the vaccine field–those who license vaccines, monitor their adverse events, set vaccination recommendations, or allocate funding for vaccination research–are fully aware of the consequences of their own actions.”

— Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth by Anonymous
https://a.co/cahaoAj

Published by Children’s Health Defence

1200 References

Available for $10.49 on Kindle