The Deadly COVID-19 Vaccine Coverup

By Virginia Stoner, Artist and Writer , Austin area , Texas —Virginiastoner.com

Vaccine dangers hiding in plain sight

FACT: There has been a massive increase in deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) this year. That’s not a ‘conspiracy theory’, that’s an indisputable fact. You can try to explain it or justify it, or even argue it doesn’t matter, but you can’t deny it.

VAERS deaths reported 1990-2021-0501.jpg

We’re not talking about a modest increase in death reports, something we might chat about in concerned voices over Chai tea and bagels at a company mixer. We’re talking about a huge and unprecedented increase—so massive that in the last 4 months alone, VAERS has received over 40% of all death reports it has ever received in its entire 30+year history. So massive it’s literally “off the chart.” The first chart in the pair below shows VAERS death reports from 2014 thru 2020. If you tried to add the 2021 data to it, it would be way, way off the chart. The second chart shows how much detail was lost when the 2021 data was squeezed in.     

VAERS deaths off the charts 2.jpg

The pair of charts below are another illustration. Notice all age groups had an increase in death reports from the COVID-19 vaccines—with both the 18-64 and 65+ age groups experiencing a dramatic “off the chart” increase.

VAERS deaths off the charts.jpg

The increase in VAERS death reports is not due to more vaccination

Even with the COVID-19 shots, the estimated total vaccines administered so far this year is less than the yearly average–because we are only a quarter of the way through this year. No doubt the vaccine count will climb much higher by the end of this year, but it’s not the reason for the massive increase in VAERS death reports over the last 4 months.    

The following chart compares estimates of vaccines administered with deaths reported to VAERS, separating COVID-19 vaccines from other vaccines. The rate of reported deaths for other vaccines looks fairly normal; the massive increase is mainly from the COVID-19 vaccines.  

VAERS Covid vs non-covid vaccines & deaths as of 5-1-2021.jpg

There are many notes at the end of this paper about how the vaccine data was estimated, and where the data for these charts was obtained, along with the data table.

What the official experts have to say (*crickets*)

With all the many experts at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ostensibly dedicated to COVID-19 and vaccine safety, not a single one has attempted to explain or analyze, or has even mentioned, the massive increase in deaths reported to VAERS from the COVID-19 shots. The silence is telling.   

But it’s not as if VAERS death reports are being hidden, exactly. VAERS data is freely available to the public…and if you don’t want to look it up, you can follow the CDC’s COVID-19 Vaccine Death Count online, which is updated regularly. Just scroll down to the section called “Reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination” for the latest numbers. Most recently, the death count went from 2794 on April 5, to 3005 on April 12, to 3848 on April 26. But a mere 1054 deaths in 21 days is no problem for the CDC—it probably just means the vaccines are working.

Covid 19 vaccine death count.jpg

I found only one paper (1) that mentioned VAERS death reports re COVID-19 vaccines. The lead author was Julianne Gee, from the CDC’s COVID-19 Response Team, and the paper concerned safety monitoring during the first month (December 14 to January 13). We are told, in the Summary:

“Monitoring … indicates reassuring safety profiles for COVID-19 vaccines. … No unusual or unexpected reporting patterns were detected.”

The authors said 113 deaths were reported to VAERS that month from the COVID-19 vaccines. Incredibly, they never compared that number to historical VAERS averages or trends…just kidding. Of course they compared it, realized it was shockingly higher than the historical average of 12 deaths per month, and decided not to mention it. Never let science interfere with good vaccine marketing.

Bizarrely, the authors actually implied the number of VAERS death reports indicated a safe vaccine, because a lot fewer deaths were reported to VAERS than they would have expected to see coincidentally among people who got the vaccine. Do you think that makes sense? I hope you said “no,” because it does not make sense. You can’t conclude a vaccine is safe because fewer people filed VAERS death reports than were expected to die coincidentally. I can’t even explain it in a way that makes sense—because it’s NONSENSE.  

They were going to die anyway…someday

One hypothesis I’ve heard, and which is hinted at by Gee, et.al. in the paper above, is that the elderly and infirm, many in long-term care facilities, were the first to be targeted by the COVID-19 vaccine campaign, and they are much more likely to die coincidentally. These coincidental deaths then lead to an increase in suspected vaccine-induced deaths reported to VAERS.  (*cough*)

VAERS data just does not support that hypothesis. First, because all age groups—not just seniors—had a dramatic increase in VAERS death reports from COVID-19 vaccines, as illustrated in the charts below. The red line represents reported COVID-19 vaccine deaths, and the green line represents other vaccines. Across the board, all age groups experienced a dramatic increase in deaths reported to VAERS from the COVID-19 shots—even the under 18 group, which has had very few COVID-19 shots (so far).   

VAERS vaccines administered & deaths reported by age group - complilation.jpg

Second, the increase in death reports in the 65+ age group is just so massive that coincidental death, no matter how sickly the population, just doesn’t seem like a sufficient and plausible explanation. After all, the elderly and infirm in long-term care facilities are frequent targets of flu shot campaigns.

What does VAERS, and the people who tend to it, do all day?

VAERS is a “hypothesis generating system” that “identifies potential vaccine safety concerns that can be studied in more robust data systems.”  VAERS uses data mining to “…identify disproportional adverse event reporting for vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccine.” VAERS also “identifies… adverse event-vaccine pairs reported at least twice as frequently as expected for a COVID-19 vaccine…” (2) (Pages 12-15)

Given the massive increase in deaths reported to VAERS—not a modest increase, but an enormous, unprecedented increase—it’s unfathomable that VAERS would not detect “disproportional” reporting, thus putting the wheels in motion to study the situation “in more robust data systems.” But there is no indication anything like that has occurred.   

According to the CDC:

“VAERS has not detected patterns in cause of death that would indicate a safety problem with COVID-19 vaccines.”

Even as the death reports continue to roll in at an astonishing rate, by the dozens and sometimes hundreds per week, in true Orwellian fashion, the CDC simply updates the Death Count on its website and reiterates:  

“VAERS has not detected patterns in cause of death that would indicate a safety problem with COVID-19 vaccines.”

And, of course, the old standby reassurance:

 “COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective.”

CDC Covid What you Need to Know.JPG

The only way it seems possible that VAERS did not detect any safety concerns, is if VAERS was actually programmed to expect a very high rate of deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines—much higher than the rate of deaths expected for other vaccines. That would explain why VAERS did not detect any “adverse event-vaccine pairs reported at least twice as frequently as expected for a COVID-19 vaccine…”

On the other hand, maybe people are just lying, and VAERS is either doing nothing at all, or something other than what we’re being told; or, it is detecting possible safety concerns with the COVID-19 vaccines like crazy, and it’s being covered up.   

But, hey—never let it be said I don’t have an open mind. Maybe one of the many highly paid and respected experts at the CDC will do an analysis—like my humble analysis here, but bigger and fancier with more bells and whistles, because they are experts—and prove the massive increase in VAERS death reports has nothing to do with dangerous COVID-19 vaccines. But I won’t be holding my breath. I think if that could be done, it would have been done already—in triplicate.

***

NOTES:

21 thoughts on “The Deadly COVID-19 Vaccine Coverup

  1. Excellent charts, and shows that for older people, the risk of death increases a lot, as I expected. Poorer immune systems as we age, as to thee vaccines compared to others. I need to further look at that.
    Winston Adams

    Like

  2. This information cannot stay suppressed forever. They may be able to do it now but many in a position of influence even in government have raise the issue.
    Senator Rand Paul is leading the charge for now but others will follow as the political damage will soon outweigh the blind compliance to a questionable science. I’ve been following this for a year now and the a pattern of non-compliance is starting to form. In Canada which was heavily pro vaccine on blog sites to about a 1/10 ratio is now about 5/10 or only half jump into the pro vaccine camp. Given enough time folks are starting to question the urgency and are getting tired of being labelled as someone who is risking the lives of others. Obviously many yielded to this online bullying campaign and now are sick of it, no pun intended. It took a while but they now realize it just doesn’t make sense anymore. If the vaccine is so effective what do adherents have to worry about?

    Like

  3. How about you use all the data? Deaths numbers without a comparison of vaccinated numbers means nothing!! if you have 200 times as many vaccinated in 2021, then the percentage of vax deaths is 50% of the 2020 number!! You can pretend you are right or you can prove you are wrong. You lie to yourself every day so i don’t expect you will correct this and republish!

    Like

    • I assume you’re implying that the number of vaccinated against the number that died from the vaccine will show a low mortality rate. this would imply that taking the vaccine is worth the risk. you are incorrect in your approach to this. you cannot add the vaccinated people in the count. just as you cannot use the population of the US against the deaths from the virus. you can only use the number of people who were infected or hospitalized. this is the number the cdc is using as well. the virus already has a mortality rate of less than 2% without taking the vaccine. 39,540,252 cases and 653,403 deaths. divide the deaths by the cases and the number is .0165 to convert this number to a percentage you move the decimal point two places to the right which gives you 1.65% or 1.7%.
      you can go to cdc.gov and get their numbers, which they are being accused of not accurately reporting, and see the mortality rate. I will give them to you but you can see for yourself, if you choose. they claim 11,050 hospitalizations of vaccinated people and 2,063 deaths. again divide the deaths by the hospitalization and you have .186 move the decimal point two places to the right and that’s 18.6% or 19%.
      mortality rate of 1.7% without the vaccine and 19% if you took the shot. chances of surviving are less than if you didn’t get vaccinated.
      only 1.5% of people infected with covid end up in the hospital.
      it is possible I could be wrong in my approach to the math concerning the vaccinated. one thing is certain, this dreaded virus is highly survivable. the number of deaths I am using includes all deaths from covid, this would include the deaths of persons who were vaccinated and that is not fair to include them but, they’re included anyway. 98% survivability I don’t see the need for being FORCED to take a vaccine. take the deaths against the US population 332,688,928 and the deaths from covid 653,403 thats .0019 or .19% of the population. what about the children, children are dying, thats horrible! 0 – 18 years olds that have died from covid I will use the numbers from the cdc’s website. 444 children under the age of 18 have died from covid. 653,403 deaths 444 are children that is .00067 or .067% of the deaths are under the age of 18. conversely 9,173 children under the age of 14 died in 2019, these are the cdc’s numbers. the impact of covid on children is nothing yet we are being told to be afraid of covid. our children in grave danger. go pound sand!!!

      Liked by 1 person

      • The children were mostly in wheelchairs and had things wrong with them , stop counting sick children , It is sad that they had to die along with the older people that are 65 and older. But if you want some one to blame you can blame Fauci for lying to the eldery that if they are vaccinated they are okay and they are not.85 percent of the people dying are over 65 ,of those 20 percent are vaccinated and thought they would be okay and those people still think they will be okay for i see them out and they really should not be. One of fauci’s underlings was on msnbc sayiing that 75000 people a day were getting covid and 1500 were dying a day. This is down 50 percent from sept 2021 numbers. 20% of those numbers mean 15000 were vaccinated and still got sick, 300 were vaccinated and died . What vaccine lets so many people die , NONE I would go so far as to say that there is a lot of younger people who are vaccinated and are asymptomatic which makes the vaccine worst percentage wise. (why do you think the cdc stopped counting people who got covid in May if they did not go to the hospital) That is funny they started talking about delta in May at that time ! Anyone can go to some states like indiana, nebraska or utah and type in breakthrough cases after the state name and see the true numbers. These states are not following cdc guidelines of only reporting hospitalized patients.
        Biden is a lameduck and fauci will pay with jail time for saying the unvaccinated are the problem. The numbers don’t lie and he has.

        Like

    • Wake up the truth is right in front of your eyes. Why do the protected need protection from the unprotected??? “Unless you lie to yourself everyday then I don’t expect you will correct this and republish!!!” xoxo

      Like

  4. People please listen. Think of it this way, “have you seen a commercial on tv for any of the covid vaccines? You know, like all other prescription drugs that lists it’s side effects? No, you haven’t because in order to get a drug commercial on tv you have to have that drug approved by the FDA and guess what this vaccine is not approved by the FDA!” Also another point I have is how come they opened up our Mexican border and let them come in unvaccinated? Are those are replacements after the vaccine kills us all within two years time?!

    Like

    • It is unbelievably contradictory to prevent citizens from living normal lives , masking up etc and yet allow illegal immigrants to pour across the border——-we live in interesting times for which truth and consistency are foreign concepts.

      Like

    • Yes, I think that’s exactly what the plan is. Have you seen the Deagel population projection for 2025? It drops 70% in Western countries. Check out the % of vaxxed people in other parts of the world. The US, Canada, Europe, and Australia seem to be pushing this agenda the hardest.

      Like

      • Yes, I have been monitoring the numbers —-i did a couple of blogs on te the 10 most populous countries and how only one was over 20% fully vaccinated. It is more a ‘Western’ phenomenon for sure.

        Like

    • There’s also a number that’s not being discussed, dying from, or dying with covid…..this is where it gets sketchy…..people dying from suicide, car crashes, natural causes, that happen to test positive, are being listed as dying from, which skews the numbers…..A LOT….also, a lot of people don’t understand, is that crap that they put on tv, or in the news about the vaccine being FDA approved….is FALSE…..it’s still considered ” for emergency use only “……that crap they put on the news was only to get more sheep to the slaughter. PLUS, they only report on the amount of vaccinations, NEVER the deaths or adverse side affects……I’ll roll the dice and take my chances before I ever have something that has been out less than a year, with no real clinical long term studies on side effects, injected into my body, if they were so good as touted in the beginning, why 2, then now 3 shots……..? Because they are NOT vaccines……a vaccine PREVENTS you from getting sick…..anyone remember the MMR vaccines from back in the day?….I do, had a huge scar on my shoulder…….those PREVENTED you from getting the diseases…..not lessen the symptoms……I’ve had the Hep vaccines because of the line of work I was in it PREVENTS you from getting it, not lessen the effects…..just as cold medicine and flu medicines in the stores lessen the symptoms…..NOT prevent the infection…..this is where they are lying to people……and the sheep follow….people need to wake up and realize this is all about control…….

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s